Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Osteoporotic conditions are anticipated to affect the osseointegration of dental implants. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a radiofrequent magnetron-sputtered calcium phosphate (CaP) coating on dental implant integration upon installment in the femoral condyles of both healthy and osteoporotic rats. At 8 weeks post-implantation, bone volume and histomorphometric bone area were lower around non-coated implants in osteoporotic rats compared with healthy rats. Interestingly, push-out tests revealed significantly enhanced implant fixation for CaP-coated compared with non-coated implants in both osteoporotic (i.e., 2.9-fold) and healthy rats (i.e., 1.5-fold), with similar implant fixation for CaP-coated implants in osteoporotic conditions compared with that of non-coated implants in healthy conditions. Further, the presence of a CaP coating significantly increased bone-to-implant contact compared with that in non-coated implants in both osteoporotic (i.e., 1.3-fold) and healthy rats (i.e., 1.4-fold). Sequential administration of fluorochrome labels showed significantly increased bone dynamics close to CaP-coated implants at 3 weeks of implantation in osteoporotic conditions and significantly decreased bone dynamics in osteoporotic compared with healthy conditions. In conclusion, analysis of the data obtained demonstrated that dental implant modification with a thin CaP coating effectively improves osseointegration in both healthy and osteoporotic conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alghamdi et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: