Key result
Combined high-frequency QRS and ST-deviation analysis improved sensitivity for ruling out myocardial ischaemia to 63% compared with ST-deviation alone (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Exercise stress testing for myocardial ischaemia is limited by low sensitivity and specificity, motivating investigation into whether adding high-frequency QRS analysis to standard ST-deviations improves diagnostic accuracy.
Does the addition of high-frequency QRS analysis to standard ST-deviation analysis improve the diagnostic accuracy for myocardial ischaemia in patients undergoing exercise stress testing?
Cohort (n=662)
Blinded
Does the addition of high-frequency QRS analysis to standard ST-deviation analysis improve the diagnostic accuracy for myocardial ischaemia in patients undergoing exercise stress testing?
Adding high-frequency QRS analysis to standard ST-deviation during exercise stress testing improves diagnostic accuracy for myocardial ischemia and provides independent prognostic value for MACE.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
HF-QRS addition to ST analysis may improve exercise test accuracy and prognosis; extends observational data but requires prospective validation before practice change.
Aim: Exercise stress testing is used to detect myocardial ischaemia, but is limited by low sensitivity and specificity. The authors investigated the value of the analysis of high-frequency QRS components as a marker of abnormal depolarization in addition to standard ST-deviations as a marker of abnormal repolarization to improve the diagnostic accuracy. Methods and results: Consecutive patients undergoing bicycle exercise stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging were prospectively enrolled. Presence of myocardial ischaemia, the primary diagnostic endpoint, was adjudicated using MPI and coronary angiography. Automated high-frequency QRS analysis was performed in a blinded fashion. The prognostic endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) during two years of follow-up. Exercise-induced ischaemia was detected in 147/662 patients (22%). The sensitivity of high-frequency QRS was similar to ST-deviations (46% vs. 43%, p=0.59), while the specificity was lower (75% vs. 87%, p<0.001). The combined use of high-frequency QRS and ST-deviations classified 59% of patients as ‘rule-out’ (both negative), 9% as ‘rule-in’ (both positive) and 32% in an intermediate zone (one test positive). The sensitivity for ‘rule-out’ and the specificity for ‘rule-in’ improved to 63% and 97% compared with ST-deviation analysis alone (both p<0.001). MACE-free survival was 90%, 80% and 42% in patients in the ‘rule-out’, intermediate and ‘rule-in’ groups (p<0.001). After adjustment for age, gender, ST-deviations and clinical post-test probability of ischaemia, high-frequency QRS remained an independent predictor for the occurrence of MACEs. Conclusion: The use of high-frequency QRS analysis in addition to ST-deviation analysis improves the diagnostic accuracy during exercise stress testing and adds independent prognostic information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schaerli et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Suspected exercise-induced myocardial ischaemia (n=662). Combined high-frequency QRS and ST-deviation analysis vs. ST-deviation analysis alone was evaluated on Presence of myocardial ischaemia (sensitivity for 'rule-out') (p=<0.001). Combined high-frequency QRS and ST-deviation analysis improved sensitivity for ruling out myocardial ischaemia to 63% compared with ST-deviation alone (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: