This research was designed to study in vitro development of bovine nuclear transferred embryos using enucleated young in vitro matured oocytes 24 h of age as recipient cytoplasts activated prior to nuclear transfer. The oocytes were enucleated and then activated with electric pulse at 24 h of age followed by incubation with cycloheximide for 6-7 h before nuclear transfer and membrane fusion with a blastomere of the 16-32 cell stage. This new protocol effectively improved cleavage (68 vs 17%, p < 0.05) and morula/blastocyst development of reconstructed embryos (29 vs 6%, p < 0.05), compared to similar nuclear transfer procedure without prior activation of recipient oocytes. Corresponding rates of cleavage and morula/blastocyst development for oocytes activated similarly without nuclear transfer were 49 and 19%. Factors affecting nuclear transfer were also compared. Two electric pulses for fusion increased rates of fusion (76 vs 60%, p < 0.05) and subsequent development of cloned embryos (32 vs 11%, p < 0.05). Cytochalasin B treatment following nuclear transfer manipulation seemed not to be beneficial in improving development of cloned embryos (p > 0.05). Both co-culture systems with buffalo rat liver (BRL) cells and cumulus cells promoted development of cloned embryos compared to the controls (28, 21 vs 0%, p < 0.05). The BRL cell system seemed to be better for manipulated embryos by reducing embryolysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Du et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: