Key result
Higher psychological distress thermometer scores were significantly associated with greater patient-reported intra-dialytic symptom scores (OR 1.30) in patients undergoing hemodiafiltration.
Why the study?
Previous reports linked dialysis recovery time to intra-dialytic hypotension and solute clearance, while others linked it to psychological factors, leaving it unclear which factors determine intra-dialytic symptoms and delayed recovery times.
Observational (n=623)
No
Odds Ratio: 1.3 (95% CI 1.3–1.39)
p-value: p=<0.001
Intra-dialytic symptoms and post-dialysis recovery times are more strongly associated with patient psychological distress and frailty than with specific dialysis prescription parameters.
Psychological distress, not dialysis parameters, drives symptoms and recovery; leaves open whether distress screening improves outcomes.
Dialysis is a life-sustaining treatment, but many patients suffer symptoms during dialysis and take time to recover. Previous reports have linked recovery time to intra-dialytic hypotension and rapid solute clearances, whereas others have reported an association with psychological factors. As such, we wished to investigate which factors were important in determining symptom self-reporting and delayed recovery times. We recorded self-reported patient intra-dialytic symptoms, recovery times along with sessional dialysis prescriptions, blood pressure and urea clearance, and distress thermometer scores to assess psychological factors. Six hundred twenty-three dialysis patients were studied; 621 treated by haemodiafiltration, 60.8% male, mean age 64.5 ± 16.2 years, and 46.1% diabetic. Almost half (49.6%) reported recovery within 1 h. On multivariate analysis, patient self-reported symptom scores were associated with longer post-dialysis recovery times (odds ratio (OR) 1.61, 95% confidence limits (CL) 1.33–1.95), higher distress thermometer scores (OR 1.3 CL (1.3–1.39), but lower hand grip strength (OR 0.85 CL (0.93–0.94), all p < 0.001, and younger rather than older patients (OR 0.98 CL (0.97–0.99) p = 0.005. We found no association with ultrafiltration rates or weight loss. Compared to earlier studies, our patients treated by haemodiafiltration reported fewer symptoms and shorter recovery times. Patients with higher self-reported distress thermometer scores had both longer post-dialysis recovery times and greater dialysis symptom scores. Younger patients reported more dialysis symptoms and longer recovery times than older patients. Future studies investigating patient self-reported recovery times and dialysis-associated symptoms should also consider interventions to reduce patient psychological factors as well as dialysis practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoowannakul et al. (2019) conducted an observational in End-stage kidney disease (n=623). Psychological distress (higher distress thermometer scores) vs. Lower distress thermometer scores was evaluated on Higher patient self-reported intra-dialytic symptom scores (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.30-1.39, p=<0.001). Higher psychological distress thermometer scores were significantly associated with greater patient-reported intra-dialytic symptom scores (OR 1.30) in patients undergoing hemodiafiltration.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: