Key result
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing provides a comprehensive physiological assessment that may improve the diagnosis and personalized management of coronary artery disease.
Why the study?
Recommended functional tests for coronary artery disease may not fully capture complex exercise physiology or provide sufficient detail to tailor personalized management.
Does cardiopulmonary exercise testing improve the diagnosis and management of patients with coronary artery disease compared to traditional functional tests?
Does cardiopulmonary exercise testing improve the diagnosis and management of patients with coronary artery disease compared to traditional functional tests?
This narrative review highlights the potential of cardiopulmonary exercise testing to provide comprehensive physiological assessment and tailor personalized management in patients with coronary artery disease.
CAD functional testing recommendations warrant caution; leaves open optimal ischemia assessment strategies.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, accounting for over 9 million deaths annually. The prevalence of CAD continues to rise, driven by ageing and the increasing prevalence of risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and obesity. Current clinical guidelines emphasize the importance of functional tests in the diagnostic pathway, particularly for assessing the presence and severity of ischemia. While recommended tests are valuable, they may not fully capture the complex physiological responses to exercise or provide the necessary detail to tailor personalized treatment plans. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) offers a comprehensive assessment of the cardiovascular, pulmonary, and muscular systems under stress, potentially addressing these gaps and providing a more precise understanding of CAD, particularly in settings where traditional diagnostics may be insufficient. By enabling more personalized and precise treatment strategies, CPET could play a central role in the future of CAD management. This narrative review examines the current evidence supporting the use of CPET in CAD diagnosis and management and explores the potential for integrating CPET into existing clinical guidelines, considering its diagnostic and prognostic capabilities, cost-effectiveness, and the challenges associated with its adoption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crispino et al. (2024) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) vs. Traditional diagnostics was evaluated. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing provides a comprehensive physiological assessment that may improve the diagnosis and personalized management of coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: