The sign of the supersymmetric Higgs boson mass {μ} is usually taken as an independent input parameter in analyses of the supersymmetric standard model. I study the role of theories of supersymmetry breaking in determining the sign of {μ} as an output. Models with vanishing soft scalar couplings at the apparent gauge coupling unification scale are known to predict a positive {μ}. I investigate more general results for the sign of {μ} as a function of the holomorphic soft scalar couplings, and compare to predictions of models with gaugino mass dominance at higher scales. In a significant region of the B₀/m1/2 versus A₀/m1/2 plane including A₀=B₀=0, μ must be positive. In another region, {μ} is definitely negative. Only in a smaller intermediate region does knowledge of the supersymmetry breaking mechanism not permit a definite prediction of the sign of {μ}. The last region will shrink considerably as the top quark mass becomes more accurately known.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephen P. Martin (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: