Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of rimegepant in elderly compared to nonelderly subjects.
Does age affect the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single 75 mg oral dose of rimegepant in adults?
Does age affect the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single 75 mg oral dose of rimegepant in adults?
The pharmacokinetics and safety of a single 75 mg oral dose of rimegepant are similar in elderly and nonelderly adults, indicating no dose adjustment is necessary for elderly patients.
Supports standard 75-mg dosing in elderly migraine patients; extends limited Phase 1 PK data but leaves open broader efficacy and safety confirmation.
Rimegepant is a small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the acute treatment of migraine ± aura and preventive treatment of migraine in adults. The pharmacokinetics of rimegepant in elderly and nonelderly subjects were evaluated. In an open-label Phase 1 study, 14 elderly (aged 65 years or older) and 14 nonelderly (aged 18 to less than 45 years) subjects each received a single oral dose of rimegepant 75 mg. Blood samples were collected before dosing and through 96 hours after dosing. The pharmacokinetic parameters of rimegepant after a single dose were similar in both age groups. Geometric least-squares mean ratios (elderly/nonelderly) of the natural log-transformed maximum observed plasma concentration and natural log-transformed area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity were 96.6 and 104.6, respectively. Eight (28.6%) subjects (4 elderly, 4 nonelderly) experienced 1 or more adverse events (AEs); all AEs were mild in intensity, and no serious AEs or AEs leading to discontinuation were reported. Following a single 75-mg dose of oral rimegepant, pharmacokinetic parameters were similar in elderly and nonelderly adults; no dose adjustment is warranted in elderly subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhardwaj et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: