Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hybrid rice ( Oryza sativa L.) hectarage has increased substantially in the southern United States and necessitated research into the N nutrition of this new type of rice and how it compares to the traditional pure‐line rice. Consequently, a study was conducted utilizing 15 N‐labeled urea applied at a range of N rates on two silt loam soils differing in native soil N to evaluate and compare the N fertilizer uptake efficiency, the native soil N uptake, and total N uptake of a RiceTec hybrid and a pure‐line rice cultivar. The hybrid (60.5 kg N ha −1 ) had greater soil N uptake compared with the pure‐line cultivar (51.7 kg N ha −1 ). The hybrid had a higher fertilizer N uptake efficiency (FNUE) compared with the pure‐line at the location with the lesser native soil N (62.2 vs. 56.2%, respectively), but had a similar FNUE at the location with the greater soil N (63.8 vs. 60.0%, respectively). Also, the pure‐line had a higher FNUE and greater N fertilizer response at the location with the greater soil N while the hybrid had a similar FNUE at both locations. The greater total N uptake by the hybrid compared with the pure‐line was due to greater soil N uptake at both locations and fertilizer N uptake at the location with the lower native soil N. The results suggest that if the native soil N is below a critical level a pure‐line rice cultivar might benefit from a higher rate of N fertilization to maximize FNUE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Norman et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: