Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We compare the X-ray (1-20 keV) and hard X-ray (20-200 keV) luminosities of black hole binaries (BHBs; i.e., binaries for which the mass of the compact object is known to exceed 3 M ☉ ) and X-ray bursters (neutron star binaries, NSBs). We discuss two ways of distinguishing a BHB from a NSB: (1) If the X-ray luminosity exceeds ~ 10 37 ergs s –1 , the hard X-ray luminosity of BHBs is relatively unaffected, whereas the hard X-ray luminosity of NSBs decreases drastically; and (2) the hard X-ray luminosity of BHBs is commonly in the range 10 37 -6 × 10 37 ergs s –1 , whereas for NSBs it is ≲ 10 37 ergs s –1 . We show that late in their decays transient BHBs (e.g., GRS 1124-68) have X-ray and hard X-ray luminosities comparable to those observed for NSBs. Thus BHBs can be distinguished from NSBs only at relatively high luminosities.We also compare NSBs with the so-called black hole candidates (BHCs; i.e., systems with similar spectral/temporal properties to BHBs). The X-ray and hard X-ray luminosities of LMC X-1, GRO J0422 + 32, GRS 1915 + 105, 4U 1543-47, and 4U 1630-47 are much larger than the maximum luminosities observed from NSBs, which supports the idea that they contain black holes. Three other BHCs, namely GRS 1716-249, 1E 1740.7-2942, and GRS 1758-258 (which all lack an ultrasoft spectral component), have hard X-ray luminosities at least a factor of ~ 2-3 above the maximum observed from NSBs, which suggests that these objects also contain black hole primaries. The case of GX 339-4 remains very uncertain because of the large uncertainty in its distance estimates (from 1.3 to 4 kpc). Assuming the larger distance, the X-ray and hard X-ray luminosities of the source, and its luminosity-related spectral changes which are similar to transient BHBs (e.g., GRS 1124-68), support the idea that it contains a black hole. Finally, the X-ray and hard X-ray luminosities of the puzzling X-ray source 4U 1957 + 11 are in the range of those observed for NSBs, consistent with the idea that it might contain a neutron star. If 4U 1957 + 11 is, in fact, a neutron star system, this would establish that the combination of a power-law tail and an ultrasoft component (which is present in the spectrum of 4U 1957+ 11) is not a unique spectral signature of an accreting black hole.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barret et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: