Why the study?
Does increasing operator experience reduce the incidence of early safety endpoints at 30 days in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation?
Does increasing operator experience reduce the incidence of early safety endpoints at 30 days in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation?
The introduction of TAVI in Japan under a strictly controlled system resulted in low early mortality and safety events, with the operator learning curve plateauing after 15-20 cases.
Operator experience may improve early TAVI safety; leaves open need for volume-based training standards.
BACKGROUND: The introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) into Japan was strictly controlled to optimize patient outcomes. The goal of this study was to assess if increasing experience during the introduction of this procedure was associated with outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: The initial 1,752 patients registered in the Japanese national TAVI registry were included in the study. The association between operator procedure number and incidence of the early safety endpoint at 30 days (ESE30) as defined in the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document was evaluated. Patients were divided into 4 groups by quartiles of procedure count (Groups I-IV in order of increasing number of procedures). Median patient age was 85 years, and 30.5% were male. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.4% (n=24), and 78 patients (7.9%) experienced 95 ESE30. Among the variables included in the model, ESE30 was associated with non-transfemoral approach (P=0.004), renal dysfunction (Cr >2.0 mg/dL) (P=0.01) and NYHA class III/IV (P=0.04). ESE30 incidence was not significantly different between Groups I-III and Group IV. Spline plots demonstrated that experience of 15-20 cases in total was needed to achieve a consistent low risk of ESE30. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing experience was associated with better outcomes, but to a lesser degree than in previous reports. Our findings suggested that the risks associated with the learning curve process were appropriately mitigated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Handa et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: