Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Photocatalytic sterilization of microorganisms in water was conducted with a tubular UV/TiO2 film reactor (SS304, 2.5 inches in diameter, 14 inches in length, and 0.65 L in effective volume) containing a 14 W low pressure mercury vapor lamp as an UV irradiation source with a maximum intensity at 254 nm, which was placed at the center of the reactor chamber. It was found that the number of E. coli was significantly declined from 1.5*107 CFU/100 mL to 270 CFU/100 mL after 5 seconds treatment with the tubular UV/TiO2 film reactor, while the survival of E. coli remained 1.3*104 CFU/100 mL for a similar commercial UV water sterilizer. In addition, the required I*t value (UV light intensity * irradiation time) for three log reduction of E. coli were 6.608 and 10.238 mW/cm2.s for a tubular UV/TiO2 film reactor and a similar commercial UV water sterilizer, respectively. On the other hand, results indicated that the higher the TSS concentration, the lower the sterilization rate for both UV and UV/TiO2 film reactors, and the adverse effect due to the presence of SS was more pronounced for UV/TiO2 film reactor than for UV reactor. However, according to the higher sterilization rate, it was still suggested that a tubular UV/TiO2 film reactor could be considered as a better alternative for water sterilization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuo et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: