The possible reaction mechanisms for CO oxidation on the perfect Cu(2)O(111) surface have been investigated by performing periodic density functional theoretical calculations. We find that Cu(2)O(111) is able to facilitate the CO oxidation with different mechanisms. Four possible mechanisms are explored (denoted as M(ER1), M(ER2), M(LH1), and M(LH2), respectively): M(ER1) is CO((gas))+O(2(ads))→CO(2(gas)); M(ER2) is CO((gas))+O(2(ads))→CO(3(ads))→O((ads))+CO(2(gas)); M(LH1) refers to CO((ads))+O(2(ads))→O((ads))+CO(2(ads)); and M(LH2) refers to CO((ads))+O(2(ads))→OOCO((ads))→O((ads))+CO(2(ads)). Our transition state calculations clearly reveal that M(ER1) and M(LH2) are both viable; but M(ER1) mechanism preferentially operates, in which only a moderate energy barrier (60.22 kJ/mol) needs to be overcome. When CO oxidation takes place along M(ER2) path, it is facile for CO(3) formation, but is difficult for its decomposition, thereby CO(3) species can stably exist on Cu(2)O(111). Of course, the reaction of CO with lattice O of Cu(2)O(111) is also considered. However, the calculated barrier is 600.00 kJ/mol, which is too large to make the path feasible. So, we believe that on Cu(2)O(111), CO reacts with adsorbed O, rather than lattice O, to form CO(2). This is different from the usual Mars-van Krevene mechanism. The present results enrich our understanding of the catalytic oxidation of CO by copper-based and metal-oxide catalysts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: