Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We report measurements of perpendicular magnetic anisotropies of epitaxial Fe/InAs(100) 4×2 and Fe/GaAs(100) 4×6 films using the polar magneto-optic Kerr effect (MOKE) and of the in-plane magnetic anisotropy, magnetization and g-factor using Brillouin light scattering (BLS). The magnetization is very close to the bulk value in all samples, demonstrating a lack of As intermixing. Both Fe/GaAs and Fe/InAs show large out-of-plane uniaxial surface anisotropy. Both show large in-plane fourfold surface anisotropies which oppose the bulk fourfold anisotropy. Fe/GaAs shows the well known in-plane uniaxial surface anisotropy which is attributed here to interface bonding. However, Fe/InAs shows almost no in-plane uniaxial surface anisotropy, despite the large strain of 5.4% compared to -1.2% for Fe/GaAs. The small in-plane uniaxial volume anisotropy which is observed for Fe/InAs is ascribed, due to the thickness dependence, to a magneto-elastic effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McPhail et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: