The transition structures (TSs) for chlorine 1,7-shift and 1,5-shift in 1,7,7-trichlorocycloheptatriene (1) and those of chlorine 1,5-shifts in 1,5,5-trichlorocyclopentadiene (3) and 1,2,5-trichloro-1,3-pentadiene (5) derivatives have been located with density functional theory (DFT) at the Becke3LYP/6-311G [and Becke3LYP/6-311+G] level. The calculational results were compared with those for corresponding hydrogen shifts in nonsubstituted molecules (cycloheptatriene (2), cyclopentadiene (4), and 1,3-pentadiene (6)). The following points were clarified: (1) The activation energy (Delta E(++)) for chlorine 1,7-shift in 1 was evaluated to be only +50.1 [+49.2] kJ/mol, which is smaller than that (+69.9 [+68.3]) for a 1,5-shift, supporting the theory that the conversion between two equivalent A and A' proceeds through a TS for direct chlorine 1,7-shift (Figure 1), rather than through a TS for a 1,5-shift (Figure 2). (2) The considerable amount of charge separation between a migrating chlorine atom (Cl(m)) and a seven-membered ring (-0.53 and +0.47 for Merz-Singh-Kollman scheme) occurs in a chlorine 1,7-shift, which is in good contrast to the result that the migrating hydrogen atom (H(m)) for a 1,7-shift in cycloheptatriene (2) carries almost no charge (Figure 3). This large charge separation can stabilize the TS for the chlorine 1,7-shift pathway. (3) The Delta E(++) values for suprafacial hydrogen 1,7-shift in 2 are quite large (+288.0 [+284.8] kJ/mol), much larger than that (+166.8 [+167.0]) for a 1,5-shift in 4 which is orbital symmetrically allowed (Figure 3). The calculation suggests that the chlorine 1,7-shift in 1 occurs easily at room temperature (actually observed experimentally) by proceeding via concerted suprafacial 1,7-shift through the zwitterionic TS with the significant assistance of Coulomb interaction between charged fragments (negatively charged chlorine atom and positively charged tropylium ring), rather than via a suprafacial 1,5-sigmatropic pathway. Other cases studied in this paper showed usual results predicted by orbital symmetrical consideration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okajima et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: