Time-resolved studies of the title reactions have been carried out over the pressure range 1−100 Torr (in SF 6 bath gas) and at temperatures in the range 293−600 K, using laser flash photolysis techniques to generate and monitor the silylenes, SiH 2 and SiMe 2 . All three reactions showed evidence of pressure dependence, consistent with third-body assisted association reactions to form silirane products. Extrapolation of the pressure-dependent rate constants gave the following Arrhenius parameters: SiH 2 + C 3 H 6, log( A /cm 3 molecule -1 s -1 ) = −9.79 ± 0.03, E a (kJ mol -1 ) = −1.9 ± 0.3; SiH 2 + C 4 H 8, log( A /cm 3 molecule -1 s -1 ) = −9.91 ± 0.04, E a (kJ mol -1 ) = −2.5 ± 0.3; SiMe 2 + C 4 H 8, log( A /cm 3 molecule -1 s -1 ) = −12.12 ± 0.02, E a (kJ mol -1 ) = −8.5 ± 0.2. These parameters are consistent with fast, nearly collision-controlled processes for SiH 2 but a tighter transition state for SiMe 2 . Rice, Ramsperger, Kassel, Marcus theory (RRKM) modeling, based on consistent transition states for silirane decomposition, and employing a weak collisional deactivation model, gave good fits to the pressure-dependent curves for each system, provided an appropriate value of E o (fitting parameter) was used for each reaction. The kinetic results are consistent with an electrophilically led addition mechanism, although methyl substitution in the alkene hardly affects the rate constants. The RRKM-derived E o values have been used to derive reaction enthalpies which are in reasonable agreement with values obtained by ab initio calculations at the G2 (MP2,SVP) level. The experimental Δ H ° values yield strain energies of 190, 196, and 216 kJ mol -1 for 2-methyl-, 2,2-dimethyl-, and 1,1-dimethylsilirane, respectively. Compared to the strain enthalpy of 167 kJ mol -1 for silirane itself, this shows that methyl substituents in the silirane products substantially increase the strain energies. Theory supports this.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Rubaiey et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: