Why the study?
Heterozygous pathogenic variants in PPARG cause FPLD3 with severe metabolic disturbances including hypertriglyceridemia, prompting investigation of FPLD3 prevalence in multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome.
What is the prevalence of pathogenic PPARG variants in patients with multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome?
What is the prevalence of pathogenic PPARG variants in patients with multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome?
Genetic screening of patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia (MCS) reveals that 3.3% have underlying familial partial lipodystrophy type 3, highlighting the need to include lipodystrophy genes in screening panels.
BACKGROUND: Heterozygous pathogenic variants in PPARG cause familial partial lipodystrophy type 3 (FPLD3; Mendelian Inheritance in Man [MIM] #604367), a heritable form of insulin resistance with multiple metabolic disturbances including hypertriglyceridemia. We investigated the prevalence of FPLD3 individuals in our cohort of patients with multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS). METHODS: We used our targeted DNA sequencing panel to screen the PPARG gene in 182 clinically diagnosed MCS patients. RESULTS: We found that 3.3% of MCS patients (6/182) had a heterozygous pathogenic PPARG variant, consistent with a diagnosis of FPLD3. The variants were PPARG p.Lys186fs (ClinVar identifier 8132), p.Glu217Lys, p.Pro454fs (ClinVar identifier 436405), p.Met284Ile, p.Ser383Arg, and p.Arg181Trp. None of these patients had previously been diagnosed with FPLD3 and their clinical and biochemical features were otherwise comparable to those of the entire MCS cohort. CONCLUSION: A small but clinically relevant subgroup of individuals with MCS has FPLD3. Clinical features in FPLD3 are subtle but the phenotype can be metabolically severe. Genetic screening of patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia should include assessment of lipodystrophy genes, since management of lipodystrophy patients is distinct from that of typical MCS patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: