Why the study?
Hypotensive episodes are common complications during dialysis, and physiological closed loop systems adjusting dialysis parameters may help reduce their occurrence.
Does a physiological closed loop control system monitoring sysBP and RBV reduce hypotensive episodes compared to a system monitoring only RBV in a laboratory dialysis simulation?
Does a physiological closed loop control system monitoring sysBP and RBV reduce hypotensive episodes compared to a system monitoring only RBV in a laboratory dialysis simulation?
A dual-parameter feedback system monitoring systolic blood pressure and relative blood volume significantly reduced simulated hypotensive episodes compared to a single-parameter system in a laboratory dialysis model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May reduce hypotensive episodes via closed-loop nfr control; leaves open efficacy in larger randomized trials.
Hypotensive Episodes (HEs) are one of the most common complications during dialysis. Occurrence of HEs can be reduced by applying physiological closed loop systems that monitor physiological parameter(s) and adjust dialysis related parameter(s). We developed a physiological closed loop control system (PCLCS) that monitors systolic blood pressure (sysBP) and relative blood volume (RBV) and calculates the net fluid removal (nfr) rate during dialysis. The performance of PCLCS was compared in the laboratory to a feedback system that monitors only RBV (BVFS). A laboratory test setup was developed to test the feedback systems. The test setup simulates nfr-rate and refilling of a patient's intravascular fluid. We studied the impact of the feedback systems PCLCS and BVFS on the number of HEs (sysBP < 90 mmHg), on the variance of sysBP and RBV, on pre to post sysBP and RBV and on the achievement of the nfr-volume. PCLCS allowed 80% less HEs than BVFS (p < 0.001). Variance of sysBP and RBV were reduced by 41.8% and by 52% (p < 0.001), respectively, when using PCLCS. There were no differences between pre to post sysBP nor between pre to post RBV when comparing PCLCS to BVFS. The nfr-volume was achieved by both feedback systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atallah et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: