Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CGA-43089 [α-(cyanomethoximino)-benzacetonitrile] seed treatment was evaluated at three Nebraska locations during 1979 and 1980 for grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor(L.) Moench] protection from injury by metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide], four other chloroacetanilide herbicides, and three metolachlor +s-triazine combinations. Acetochlor [2-chloro-N-(ethoxymethyl)-6′-ethyl-o-acetotoluidide] caused the most frequent and severest injury to unprotected and protected sorghum. Soilincorporated metolachlor produced more consistent injury than preemergence application to unprotected sorghum, but placement did not affect CGA-43089 protection. Sorghum-stand reduction was the type of injury most frequently encountered, but crop yield was least affected. CGA-43089 always protected the grain sorghum from yield reduction with these herbicides.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roeth et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: