Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The behavior of mixtures of a nonionic surfactant, pentaethylene glycol monodecyl ether (C 10 E 5 ), and an anionic surfactant, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), was studied at the water−silica interface. In contrast to the C 10 E 5 surfactant, which is adsorbed at the silica−water interface at pH ≅ 6, the adsorption of the anionic surfactant is not observed. In the presence of SDS, the adsorption of C 10 E 5 is severely restricted as result of the formation of mixed micelles in solution. This behavior is consistent with the adsorption free energy, Δ G ads, of C 10 E 5 and the free energy of mixed micellization, Δ G mix.mic, of SDS and C 10 E 5 . Flow microcalorimetry (FMC) results showed that the addition of C 10 E 5 /SDS mixtures to silica precoated with C 10 E 5 resulted in the release of the preadsorbed nonionic surfactant; the whole phenomenon is exothermic. Combination of calorimetric data (FMC and isothermal titration calorimetry), self-diffusion coefficients, and the regular solution theory led to the conclusion that the main driving force for the C 10 E 5 desorption was the formation of mixed micelles by unimeric SDS and the released nonionic surfactant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thibaut et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: