Recently, "renormalized entropy" was proposed as a novel measure of relative entropy [P. Saparin et al., Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 4, 1907 (1994)] and applied to several physiological time sequences, including electroencephalograms (EEGs) of patients with epilepsy. We show here that this measure is just a modified Kullback-Leibler (KL) relative entropy, and it gives similar numerical results to the standard KL entropy. The latter better distinguishes frequency contents of, e.g., seizure and background EEGs than renormalized entropy. We thus propose that renormalized entropy might not be as useful as claimed by its proponents. In passing, we also make some critical remarks about the implementation of these methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quiroga et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: