It is understood that a major controlling factor in the development of latex particle morphology is the extent to which second stage oligomeric radicals can diffuse into the particles after entry from the aqueous phase. This leads to the expectation that any factor which decreases the diffusion rate of second stage radicals should decrease radical penetration, and thus favor the formation of core–shell type morphologies. The occurrence of crosslinking reactions during the second stage may be one such factor, since the branched and crosslinked chains diffuse much more slowly (if at all) than their linear counterparts. This paper addresses the effect of the addition of crosslinking agent (a divinyl monomer) during the second stage polymerization on particle morphology. It is shown experimentally that, contrary to what one might expect, crosslinking during the second stage has very little, if any, effect on morphology. Modeling suggests that the reason is that the probability for radicals to develop a branch before penetrating a significant distance into the particles is very low (under conditions where full penetration is possible in the absence of crosslinking agent), especially for what is considered to be typical concentrations of crosslinking agent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stubbs et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: