Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article chronicles a year‐long investigation into one university's search for a provost. Utilizing a communication approach to organizational decision making, we identify key elements in the search and selection process and explore them from multiple perspectives. Specifically, we employ Martin's (1992) typology of approaches to organisational culture to highlight three narrative views of the process as integrated, differentiated, and fragmented. We conclude that search committee members use differing interpretations as rhetorical resources for performing arguments to various audiences. State “sunshine laws” and assumptions about rationality and social hierarchy were elements of a broader “cultural nexus” of influences on the decision process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eisenberg et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: