Why the study?
Right ventricular involvement in left ventricular hypertrabeculation remains under investigation, and assessing right ventricular function is challenging due to its complex anatomy.
Does 3D transthoracic echocardiography detect subclinical right ventricular dysfunction in patients with left ventricular hypertrabeculation and preserved ejection fraction compared to controls?
Does 3D transthoracic echocardiography detect subclinical right ventricular dysfunction in patients with left ventricular hypertrabeculation and preserved ejection fraction compared to controls?
3D echocardiography reveals subclinical right ventricular dysfunction in patients with left ventricular non-compaction and preserved LV ejection fraction, highlighting the need for comprehensive biventricular assessment.
3D TTE biventricular assessment in LVNC with preserved EF is hypothesis-generating; leaves open its prognostic value pending larger studies.
Right ventricular (RV) involvement in left ventricular hypertrabeculation (LVNC) remains under investigation. Due to its complex anatomy, assessing RV function is challenging, but 3D transthoracic echocardiography (3D_TTE) offers valuable insights. We aimed to evaluate volumetric, functional, and strain parameters of both ventricles in LVNC patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and compare findings to a control group. This study included 37 LVNC patients and 37 age- and sex-matched controls. 3D_TTE recordings were analyzed using TomTec Image Arena (v. 4.7) and reVISION software to assess volumes, EF, and global/segmental strains. RV EF was further divided into longitudinal (LEF), radial (REF), and antero-posterior (AEF) components. LV volumes were significantly higher in the LVNC group, while RV volumes were comparable. EF and strain values were lower in both ventricles in LVNC patients. RV movement analysis showed significantly reduced LEF and REF, whereas AEF remained normal. These findings suggest subclinical RV dysfunction in LVNC, emphasizing the need for follow-up, even with preserved EF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horváth et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: