Why the study?
Does over-expression of HIF-1α prevent hypoxia-induced apoptosis in neonatal rat cardiac fibroblasts?
Does over-expression of HIF-1α prevent hypoxia-induced apoptosis in neonatal rat cardiac fibroblasts?
HIF-1α over-expression protects neonatal rat cardiac fibroblasts from hypoxia-induced apoptosis, suggesting it may be a potential therapeutic target for heart remodeling after hypoxic injury.
May warrant investigation of HIF-1α modulation in hypoxic remodeling; hypothesis-generating in animal models only.
OBJECTIVES: A great number of studies indicate that cardiac fibroblasts are essential for maintaining the structure and function of heart. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) is a central transcriptional regulator of hypoxic response. The present study examined whether over-expression of HIF-1α could prevent hypoxia-induced injury in neonatal rat cardiac fibroblasts and, if so, its possible molecular targets. METHODS: Western blotting was used to detect protein level. MTT, electron microscopy, TUNEL staining and confocal microscopy were used to identify cell viability, cell apoptosis and intracellular calcium ([Ca]i) in cardiac fibroblasts, respectively. RESULTS: When cardiac fibroblasts were exposed to hypoxia, HIF-1α protein in nuclei was transiently accumulated at 1 h, and then gradually degraded within 24 h of hypoxia exposure. Over-expression of HIF-1α enhanced nucleus expression of HIF-1α in cardiac fibroblasts, and significantly abolished the decrease of cell viability and cell apoptosis caused by 24-h hypoxia. Accordingly, hypoxia-induced Bax up-regulation, Bcl-2 down-regulation, caspase-3 activation and overload of [Ca]i in cardiac fibroblasts were reversed by HIF-1α over-expression, but were promoted by 30 μmol/l SC205346, a specific HIF-1α blocker. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that HIF-1α may act as a protective factor in the apoptotic process of cardiac fibroblasts and represent a potential therapeutic target for heart remodeling after hypoxia injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: