Key result
Handheld ultrasound with CW Doppler shows excellent correlation with standard cart-based systems for Vmax measurements.
Why the study?
Handheld ultrasound devices have been limited by the lack of spectral Doppler capability to quantify flow velocity and valve hemodynamics, which this study evaluated using a novel device with continuous-wave Doppler.
Does a novel handheld ultrasound device with continuous-wave Doppler capability accurately measure flow velocity in valvular heart disease compared to a standard cart-based system?
Cross-Sectional (n=56)
Randomized order of scanning
No
Does a novel handheld ultrasound device with continuous-wave Doppler capability accurately measure flow velocity in valvular heart disease compared to a standard cart-based system?
Effect estimate: r=0.99 for aortic Vmax; r=0.98 for valvular regurgitation Vmax
p-value: p=<0.001
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“EchoNous set out to build an AI automated 'power tool' that can handle the heavy lifting of diagnostic challenges – those faced by Cardiology critical care and all other POCUS users. The AI automation on Kosmos is showing true promise, validated by studies soon to be published showing that it reduces learning and competence cycle time for novice users.”
A novel handheld ultrasound device with continuous-wave Doppler capability provides peak jet velocity measurements comparable to standard cart-based echocardiography systems in patients with valvular heart disease.
Background/Introduction Echocardiography is the primary non-invasive imaging method for the diagnosis and evaluation of valvular heart disease. Doppler echocardiography provides accurate non-invasive evaluation of valve hemodynamics. Recent technological advancements have enabled the acquisition of echocardiographic images at the point-of-care by using small handheld ultrasound devices (HUDs); their availability and relatively low cost compared to the high-end systems have made these devices attractive to use for rapid medical decision making. However, the inability to quantify flow velocity has been a major limitation for HUDs; the lack of spectral Doppler capability has so far hindered the comprehensive assessment of haemodynamic data and valve function. Purpose To evaluate for the first time the accuracy of a novel HUD with continuous-wave (CW) Doppler capability to measure flow velocity in valvular heart disease. Methods We prospectively included 56 consecutive patients who were referred to the echocardiography laboratory of a tertiary hospital. All patients were scanned with both the Kosmos HUD and the standard echocardiography cart-based system (reference standard) in a randomized order. CW Doppler measurements of maximum velocities (Vmax) were obtained from the apical five-chamber view for the aortic ejection and regurgitation and from the apical four-chamber view for the mitral and tricuspid regurgitation (presence assessed by colour Doppler), maintaining a parallel orientation between the ultrasound beam and the blood flow. All measurements were compared to assess inter-method agreement using linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. Results The acquisition of CW Doppler signal using the HUD was feasible in 55 out of 56 patients (mean age 66±16 years old, 40% female). Among them, there were 31 cases of (at least mild) aortic stenosis and 23 cases of valvular regurgitation (4 aortic, 6 mitral and 13 tricuspid regurgitations). There was excellent correlation between the HUD and the cart-based system CW Doppler for the aortic Vmax measurements (r=0.99, p<0.001) and for the valvular regurgitation Vmax measurements (r=0.98, p<0.001). The corresponding Bland-Altman plots showed a small underestimation bias of −0.13 m/sec (p<0.001), with limits of agreement ±0.41 m/sec for the aortic Vmax and −0.21 m/sec (p=0.003), with limits of agreement ±0.57 m/sec for the valvular regurgitation Vmax measurements. Conclusion A novel HUD with CW Doppler spectral analysis was able to provide peak jet velocity measurements comparable to the standard cart-based echocardiography systems, in patients with valvular stenosis and regurgitation. Such expanded capabilities of HUDs show clinical potential and may lead to the improvement of the assessment of valvular pathology at the point-of-care. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sachpekidis et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Valvular heart disease (n=56). Kosmos handheld ultrasound device (HUD) with continuous-wave (CW) Doppler vs. Standard echocardiography cart-based system was evaluated on Inter-method agreement of CW Doppler measurements of maximum velocities (Vmax) (r=0.99 for aortic Vmax; r=0.98 for valvular regurgitation Vmax, p=<0.001). A novel handheld ultrasound device with continuous-wave Doppler showed excellent correlation with standard cart-based systems for aortic (r=0.99, p<0.001) and valvular regurgitation (r=0.98, p<0.001) Vmax measurements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: