Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights logical HF guideline processes now; leaves open empirical validation of development methods for researchers.
The rapid growth of medical knowledge has created many advances in therapeutics related to chronic disease. Translation of these advances into everyday care of patients with chronic disease has proven problematic. Guideline development offers a principal strategy to improve use of new and existing therapeutic modalities of proven benefit. To be effective, practice guidelines must not only deal with which therapies are efficacious but attempt to consider the many practical aspects necessary in the actual care of patients. In this way both the art and science of medicine can be employed to obtain optimal patient outcomes in many chronic diseases that have been associated with severe mortality, morbidity, and poor quality of life. The logical process of guideline development and its use in one specific chronic disease, heart failure, is examined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kirkwood F. Adams (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: