Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Angiogenesis is a fundamental physiological process; however, its pathological dysregulation drives diseases such as solid tumors, wet age-related macular degeneration, and rheumatoid arthritis. Although clinically effective, conventional anti-angiogenic monoclonal antibodies are limited by poor tissue penetration, off-target toxicities, and susceptibility to compensatory resistance. This review systematically examines the structural advantages and engineering strategies of nanobodies (Nbs) targeting angiogenesis-related pathways. Advanced engineering approaches, such as AI-assisted humanization and multivalent assembly, effectively mitigate immunogenicity and extend serum half-life. Furthermore, multispecific designs can simultaneously block compensatory pathways to circumvent resistance. Moreover, preclinical studies indicate that integrating these molecules into site-specific nanobody-drug conjugates and targeted delivery vehicles may improve therapeutic precision and local drug accumulation; however, their long-term safety, manufacturability, and clinical benefit remain to be established. Functionalizing Nbs with radionuclides or fluorophores may enable the development of novel theranostic platforms that support real-time molecular imaging and image-guided surgery. In parallel, nanobody-based CAR-T (Nb-CAR-T) cells facilitate the targeted remodeling of the disease microenvironment. Ultimately, this review highlights the value of engineered Nbs as a highly programmable and transformative platform. By overcoming key limitations of conventional antibodies, engineered nanobodies open new avenues for precise, multi-dimensional interventions in solid tumors. Their potential in certain non-neoplastic angiogenic diseases is emerging but requires further validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: