The New Jersey courts have completed their review of the “Baby M” case, and further litigation regarding her custody is unlikely, at least in the foreseeable future. However, many questions remain about the practice of surrogate motherhood. In this final article of the series on this issue, attention is drawn to the views of professionals, in both the mental health and legal fields, on the resolution of the Baby M case specifically and surrogate motherhood in general.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaslow et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: