Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Three feed grade sources of methionine were evaluated with laying hens fed a 14.6% protein basal diet containing .229% methionine and .21% cystine. Supplemental levels of .025, .05, .10, and .15% of each source were fed for 28 weeks to hens in colony cages. The supplements were DL-methionine (DL-Met), methionine hydroxy analogue acid (MHAA), and the calcium salt of methionine hydroxy analogue (MHA-Ca). Each was fed in equimolar amounts using values of 99.0, 88.7, and 82.8%, respectively, for the amount of active ingredient present. Regressions of egg output (g egg/bird/day) on total sulfur amino acid intake (mg TSAA/bird/day) showed significant linear responses to each of the three sources over the supplemental range tested. The slopes (regression coefficients) and intercepts of the three regressions were not statistically different (P>.05). It was concluded that mere were no significant differences in the effectiveness of the three materials for laying hen performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reid et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: