Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thermal laser angioplasty uses constant laser power, producing widely variable tip temperatures in vivo. Results have been suboptimal. We studied the effect of 50-400 degrees C tip temperatures on depth of ablation at 192 sites on plaqued and normal human aorta in vitro, and the angiographic and histologic response in vivo of 300-400 degrees C at probe/vessel ratios of 0.5-1.0, in 40 normal canine femoral artery segments. In vitro, there was a direct relationship between tip temperature and depth of ablation, r = 0.71 (all segments), r = 0.74 for fibrous plaque, but a poor correlation in fatty plaque r = 0.35. In fibrous plaque, there was proportionately more ablation at tip temperatures greater than 300 degrees C, mean depth 0.62 mm, than at 150-300 degrees C, mean 0.37 mm, (P less than .001). Ablation was similar in plaqued and normal aorta. In vivo, 300 degrees C, 350 degrees C, and 400 degrees C produced similar effects. At probe/vessel ratios less than 0.8, only disruption of internal elastic lamina was observed. At ratios greater than or equal to 0.8, spasm occurred in 39% (7/18), transmural damage in 28% (5/18), and perforation in one of 18. Ablation is not selective for plaque and is highly variable in fatty plaque. Tip temperatures above 300 degrees C produce greater ablation than at lower temperatures. In clinical applications, probe/vessel rations less than or equal to 0.7 may be most appropriate, and it appears that thermal remodeling may contribute more to outcome than plaque ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vincent et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: