Complex harmonic analysis (CHA) provides a computationally efficient alternative to finite element analysis (FEA) for modelling multi‐phase wound field synchronous machines. This paper presents three methods that could improve the accuracy of the CHA: by improving the equivalent air gap, by including a saturation factor, and by using image methods for computing end‐winding inductance. The comparison against a finite element method and experiment shows the improved complex harmonic method could predict waveforms reliably, where a dynamic finite element method would be time‐consuming. This paper shows the method is valid for a five‐phase generator.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: