The influence of surface free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque microbiology was examined in 9 patients with functional fixed prostheses supported by endosseous titanium implants. Two abutments (trans-mucosal part of the 2 stage implant) were replaced by either a new titanium abutment or a fluor-ethylene-propylene (FEP) coated abutment per subject. After 3 months of habitual oral hygiene, plaque samples were taken. Supragingival plaque was examined by means of differential phase-contrast microscopy, whereas for the subgingivial plaque additional analyses (DNA probes analysis, culturing) were performed. The subgingival samples were taken by paper-points and by scraping of the subgingival abutment surface. Differential phase-contrast microscopy showed a significant difference in plaque composition, especially when supragingival plaque was considered (P = 0.05). FEP coated abutments frequently harbored more coccoid microorganisms, whereas spirochetes or motile organisms were only detected around titanium abutments. Subgingivally, the number of colony forming units (CFU) in paper-points was comparable for both types of abutments. If the to-the-abutment-adhering plaque was considered, the number of CFU was 5 times higher on the titanium abutments than on the FEP coated abutments. However, this difference did not reach a statistical level of significance (P = 0.38). The DNA probe analysis of the subgingival plaque collected with paper-points showed a slightly higher frequency and concentration of perio-pathogens around the titanium abutments. However, the inter-substratum differences were smaller than the inter-subject differences. The latter seemed to be related to patient's dental status.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quirynen et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: