Why the study?
To explore the utility of 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy in identifying anthracycline-induced cardiac toxicity in patients with breast cancer.
Does 31P Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy identify anthracycline-induced cardiac toxicity in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer receiving chemotherapy?
Does 31P Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy identify anthracycline-induced cardiac toxicity in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer receiving chemotherapy?
In a small pilot study, 31P MRS did not show clear changes in myocardial energetics during anthracycline chemotherapy despite evidence of reduced LVEF and increased cardiac biomarkers.
PURPOSETo explore the utility of phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P MRS) in identifying anthracycline-induced cardiac toxicity in patients with breast cancer.METHODS20 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy had cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and 31P MRS to determine myocardial Phosphocreatine/Adenosine Triphosphate ratio (PCr/ATP) at three time points: pre, mid and end-chemotherapy. Plasma high sensitivity cardiac troponin-I (cTn-I) tests and electrocardiograms were also performed at these same time points. RESULTS PCr/ATP ratio did not change significantly between pre- and mid-chemo (2.16±0.46 v 2.00±0.56, p=0.80) and pre- and end-chemo (2.16±0.46 v 2.17±0.86, p=0.99). Mean LVEF reduced significantly by 5.1% between pre- and end-chemo (61.4±4.4 vs 56.3±8.1 %, p=0.02). Change in PCr/ATP ratios from pre- to end-chemo correlated inversely with changes in LVEF over the same period (r=-0.65, p=0.006). Plasma cTn-I increased progressively during chemotherapy from pre- to mid-chemo (1.35±0.81 to 4.40±2.64 ng/L; p=0.01) and from mid to end-chemo (4.40±2.64 to 18.33±13.23 ng/L; p=0.001). CONCLUSIONSIn this small cohort pilot study, we did not observe a clear change in mean PCr/ATP values during chemotherapy despite evidence of increased plasma cardiac biomarkers and reduced LVEF. Future similar studies should be adequately powered to take account of patient drop-out and variable changes in PCr/ATP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Macnaught et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: