Why the study?
Recent studies suggest LV dysfunction in PAH patients, but the potential role of LV ischemia contributing to it has not been systematically studied.
Does oxygen-sensitive CMR and T1 mapping detect left ventricular myocardial ischemia in patients with pulmonary hypertension without obstructive CAD?
Does oxygen-sensitive CMR and T1 mapping detect left ventricular myocardial ischemia in patients with pulmonary hypertension without obstructive CAD?
Patients with pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension exhibit impaired left ventricular myocardial oxygenation and vasodilatory response during stress CMR, suggesting the presence of coronary microvascular dysfunction.
LV microvascular ischemia evident in pre-capillary PH without CAD; leaves open CMD contribution to LV dysfunction and need for prospective trials.
Background: Prognosis in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is largely dependent on right ventricular (RV) function. However, recent studies have suggested the presence of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in PAH patients. The potential role of LV ischemia, as a contributor to progressive LV dysfunction, has not been systematically studied in PAH. We aim to assess the presence and extent of LV myocardial ischemia in patients with known PH and without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), using oxygen-sensitive (OS) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and stress/rest CMR T1 mapping. Methods: We prospectively recruited 28 patients with right heart catheter-proven PH and no significant CAD, 8 patients with known CAD and 11 normal age-matched controls (NC). OS-CMR images were acquired using a T2* sequence and T1 maps were acquired using Shortened Modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (ShMOLLI) at rest and adenosine-induced stress vasodilatation; ΔOS-CMR signal intensity (SI) index (stress/rest SI) and ΔT1 reactivity (stress-rest/rest T1 mapping) were calculated. Results: Global LV ΔOS SI index was significantly lower in PH patients compared with controls (11.1%±6.7% vs. 20.5%±10.5%, P=0.016), as was ΔT1 reactivity (5.2%±4.5% vs. 8.0%±2.9%, P=0.047). The ischemic segments of CAD patients had comparable ΔOS SI (10.3%±6.4% vs. 11.1%±6.7%, P=0.773) to PH patients, but lower ΔT1 reactivity (1.1%±4.2% vs. 5.2%±4.5%, P=0.036). Conclusions: Decreased OS-CMR SI and T1 reactivity signify the presence of impaired myocardial oxygenation and vasodilatory response in PH patients. Given their unobstructed epicardial coronary arteries, this is likely secondary to coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raman et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: