This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: Current published asthma predictive tools have moderate positive likelihood ratios (+LR) but high negative likelihood ratios (-LR) based on their recommended cut-offs, which limit their clinical usefulness. OBJECTIVE: To develop a simple clinically applicable asthma prediction tool within a population-based birth cohort. METHOD: Children from the Manchester Asthma and Allergy Study (MAAS) attended follow-up at ages 3, 8 and 11 years. Data on preschool wheeze were extracted from primary-care records. Parents completed validated respiratory questionnaires. Children were skin prick tested (SPT). Asthma at 8/11 years (school-age) was defined as parentally reported (a) physician-diagnosed asthma and wheeze in the previous 12 months or (b) ≥3 wheeze attacks in the previous 12 months. An asthma prediction tool (MAAS APT) was developed using logistic regression of characteristics at age 3 years to predict school-age asthma. RESULTS: Of 336 children with physician-confirmed wheeze by age 3 years, 117(35%) had school-age asthma. Logistic regression selected 5 significant risk factors which formed the basis of the MAAS APT: wheeze after exercise; wheeze causing breathlessness; cough on exertion; current eczema and SPT sensitisation(maximum score 5). A total of 281(84%) children had complete data at age 3 years and were used to test the MAAS APT. Children scoring ≥3 were at high risk of having asthma at school-age (PPV > 75%; +LR 6.3, -LR 0.6), whereas children who had a score of 0 had very low risk(PPV 9.3%; LR 0.2). CONCLUSION: MAAS APT is a simple asthma prediction tool which could easily be applied in clinical and research settings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: