The validity of real and complex equivalent refractive index models (ERIMs) is verified for a shielding effectiveness evaluation of high-transmittance double-layer metallic meshes. Theoretical and experimental studies show that the real ERIM is invalid for thin substrates and inaccurate for thick substrates for double-layer meshes, although it has long been used successfully for single-layer meshes. However, the complex ERIM shows more reasonable results not only for double-layer but also for single-layer meshes, and the evaluation accuracy is further improved by modifying the equivalent reactance coefficient using least-squares fitting. Therefore, the modified complex ERIM is applicable in most conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: