Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: To establish the responsiveness of the Danish version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM-DK). Method: A cross-sectional study was performed in three Danish settings, including 88 clients, 40 men, aged 16-90 years, with a variety of diagnoses. To determine construct responsiveness, the mean changes of the COPM performance and satisfaction score (COPM-P/S) were compared and correlated with the mean changes in the five-item World Health Organization (WHO) Well-Being Index (WHO-5) and the EuroQol-five domains-five levels questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). To determine the responsiveness, data were analysed with ROC curves to establish the optimal cut-point values for the COPM-DK scores. Minimal important change (MIC) was assessed in relation to anchor-based questions. Results: The mean change for COPM-P/S was 3.1 and 3.0, respectively. Small positive correlations were found between the COPM-DK scores and the WHO-5 and EQ-5D-5L scores. The AUC were 0.76 and 0.75, respectively. The optimal cut-point values for the COPM-P/S-scores based on either all positive answers or to the two highest, were 1.2 or 4.20 (COPM-P) and 1.67 or 5.80 (COPM-S), respectively. Conclusions: The capability of the COPM to detect changes in perceived occupational performance issues is supported. We recommend an MIC on 3.5 points on both scales.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Larsen et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: