Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The intent of this paper is to criticize contemporary methodology in prehistoric demography and to suggest several new types of archaeological evidence which may be indicative of population growth and population pressure. Standard methodologies have tended to underestimate population growth in pre-agricultural societies and to underestimate the role of population pressure in causing economic change. It is argued that with increased sensitivity to additional sources of evidence, it becomes clear that population growth and population pressure are essentially ubiquitous in the archaeological record and can readily be perceived as leading to economic and technological growth culminating in the origins of agriculture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mark Nathan Cohen (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: