Why the study?
HoFH with null-null LDL receptor mutations can resist standard drugs, and standard lipoprotein apheresis is invasive and arduous for very young patients.
Does evinacumab reduce LDL cholesterol in a very young infant with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia?
Does evinacumab reduce LDL cholesterol in a very young infant with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia?
Evinacumab safely and effectively lowered atherogenic lipids by over 80% in a 13-month-old infant with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, suggesting a viable alternative to lipoprotein apheresis in very young patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LA access barriers limit HoFH care; leaves open need for effective alternatives in resistant null-null cases.
The rare homozygous form of familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is characterized by extremely high low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, typically exceeding 13 mmol/L (500 mg/dL), and a variable phenotype that may include marked premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. HoFH with null-null LDL receptor mutations can be highly resistant to standard pharmacological therapies. The standard of care treatment option is lipoprotein apheresis (LA). However, LA is not commonly available, is technically demanding, and is relatively invasive and arduous for very young patients. Here we report effective lowering of the LDL cholesterol in a 13-month-old child with HoFH treated with evinacumab, initially at a low dose (7.5 mg/kg), later increased to 15 mg/kg/28 days. The decision was made after the failure of standard drug therapies in a sibling with the same null-null mutation in the LDL receptor, submitted to liver transplantation, who had severe complications. The treatment with evinacumab was safe and effective; LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B concentrations all decreased by over 80%. Our findings suggest that evinacumab is a safe and effective option for treating very young patients with HoFH who do not respond to conventional therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fornari et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: