The reaction of [Co(II)(NO3)2]·6H2O with the nitroxide radical, 4-dimethyl-2,2-di(2-pyridyl) oxazolidine-N-oxide (L(•)), produces the mononuclear transition-metal complex [Co(II)(L(•))2](NO3)2 (1), which has been investigated using temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, electrochemistry, density functional theory (DFT) calculations, and variable-temperature X-ray structure analysis. Magnetic susceptibility measurements and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis reveal a central low-spin octahedral Co(2+) ion with both ligands in the neutral radical form (L(•)) forming a linear L(•)···Co(II)···L(•) arrangement. This shows a host of interesting magnetic properties including strong cobalt-radical and radical-radical intramolecular ferromagnetic interactions stabilizing a S = (3)/2 ground state, a thermally induced spin crossover transition above 200 K and field-induced slow magnetic relaxation. This is supported by variable-temperature EPR spectra, which suggest that 1 has a positive D value and nonzero E values, suggesting the possibility of a field-induced transverse anisotropy barrier. DFT calculations support the parallel alignment of the two radical π*NO orbitals with a small orbital overlap leading to radical-radical ferromagnetic interactions while the cobalt-radical interaction is computed to be strong and ferromagnetic. In the high-spin (HS) case, the DFT calculations predict a weak antiferromagnetic cobalt-radical interaction, whereas the radical-radical interaction is computed to be large and ferromagnetic. The monocationic complex [Co(III)(L(-))2](BPh4) (2) is formed by a rare, reductively induced oxidation of the Co center and has been fully characterized by X-ray structure analysis and magnetic measurements revealing a diamagnetic ground state. Electrochemical studies on 1 and 2 revealed common Co-redox intermediates and the proposed mechanism is compared and contrasted with that of the Fe analogues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gass et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: