Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The results of the spin-wave method of Holstein and Primakoff are extended to obtain approximate values for the dependence of the energy of magnetically saturated cubic crystals upon the direction of magnetization. The anisotropy at 0^∘{}K is calculated for the cases of dipolar ferromagnetism and exchange ferromagnetism. In a nearest neighbor approximation, the results agree with those obtained by Van Vleck from a treatment of ferromagnetic anisotropy. However, in the case of dipolar interaction, the nearest neighbor approximation is not sufficient and more distant neighbors are included. For dipolar ferromagnetism, the method gives the following results: In a face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice of spins S, the anisotropy constant K₁ is a maximum when there is no external field and is then given by K₁=-0.11 M₀²S, where M₀ is the saturation magnetization. In a body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice, with no external field, K₁=-0.15M₀²S. An external field must be applied to obtain saturation in a simple cubic (sc) lattice; K₁=+0.43M₀²S when the external field H=0.6M₀. More generally, in the presence of an external field H, then K₁=κ(M₀²S)((4π3)+HM₀)^-1, where κ=-0.46 for an fcc lattice, -0.63 for a bcc lattice, and +2.06 for an sc lattice. All values given are for specimens having zero demagnetizing field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jack R. Tessman (1954) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: