Why the study?
Current aortic stenosis diagnosis and classification are not sex-sensitive despite distinct differences in natural history, warranting investigation into sex-differences particularly concerning flow-patterns via phase-contrast CMR.
Does functional aortic valve area differ between sexes in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Does functional aortic valve area differ between sexes in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Functional aortic valve area and flow patterns differ significantly between sexes in severe aortic stenosis, suggesting that diagnostic and classification criteria may need to be sex-sensitive.
Sex-specific functional AVA and flow differences may warrant caution with uniform thresholds in women; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) is one of the most prevalent valvular heart-diseases in Europe. Currently, diagnosis and classification are not sex-sensitive; however, due to a distinctly different natural history of AS, further investigations of sex-differences in AS-patients are needed. Thus, this study aimed to detect sex-differences in severe AS, especially concerning flow-patterns, via phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (PC-CMR). Methods: Forty-four severe AS-patients (20 women, 45 % vs. 24 men, 55 %) with a median age of 72 years underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), cardiac catheterization (CC) and CMR. Aortic valve area (AVA) and stroke volume (SV) were determined in all modalities, with CMR yielding geometrical AVA via cine-planimetry and functional AVA via PC-CMR, the latter being also used to examine flow-properties. However, functional AVA differed significantly between sexes in all three modalities (TTE: p = 0.044; CC/PC-CMR: p < 0.001). In men, no significant intermethodical biases in functional AVA-measurements between modalities were found (p = 0.278); yet, in women the particular measurements differed significantly (p < 0.001). Momentary flowrate showed sex-differences depending on momentary opening-degree (at 50 %, 75 % and 90 % of peak-AVA, all p < 0.001), with men showing higher flowrates with increasing opening-area. In women, flowrate did not differ between 75 % and 90 % of peak-AVA (p = 0.191). Conclusions: In severe AS-patients, functional AVA showed marked sex-differences in all modalities, whilst geometrical AVA did not differ. Inter-methodical biases were negligible in men, but not in women. Lastly, significant sex-differences in flow-patterns fit in with the different pathogenesis of AS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Troger et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: