A 34-year infant screening program in Germany successfully identified 147 boys with DMD and 33 with BMD, establishing incidences of 1:3,600 and 1:15,500 male births, respectively.
Offers historical context for DMD screening origins; leaves open questions on contemporary ethics and implementation.
EDITOR'S NOTE: This article by Dr. Günter Scheuerbrandt is a fascinating personal account and historical narrative of the birth and development of a screening program for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy in Germany, beginning 40 years ago. As the author notes, approval of an institutional review board or ethics committee was not required for this type of scientific investigation in one's field at the time this program was begun, but we have removed all personal data from any of the materials presented in here in order to conform to current concepts of ethical publication. This article is about the screening of 528,410, mostly 4-6-week-old, boys in Germany between 1977 and 2011 for high levels of creatine kinase (CK) to identify those with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD). During these 34 years of infant screening, 147 boys with confirmed, probable, and possible DMD (incidence 1:3,600 male births) and 33 boys with confirmed, probable, and possible BMD (incidence 1:15,500 male births) were found. Research reports about DMD were sent to families and pediatricians participating in the screening, and, on request, to families and scientists everywhere. It is hoped that screening programs used as the basis for future therapies will be able to modify the natural history of boys with DMD. New dystrophin mutations will continue to occur, necessitating screening and early therapy. Abstract Submitted for Presentation at the 10th International Society for Neonatal Screening-Asia Pacific Regional Meeting, August 2017, Ulaanbataar, Mongolia. Muscle Nerve 57: 185-188, 2018.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Günter Scheuerbrandt (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: