Ceramide acts as an intracellular second messenger in cellular signal transduction. We examined the effects of two cell-permeable ceramides, C2-ceramide and C6-ceramide, on human monocyte functions. After monocytes were primed with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) for 18 hr in suspension culture, they produced a high amount of superoxide (O2-) when triggered by phorbol myristate acetate. C2- or C6-ceramide inhibited O2- release from monocytes primed with LPS (1 ng/ml) or IFN-gamma (100 U/ml), but did not affect unprimed monocytes. An analogue, C2-dihydroceramide, was inactive. C2-ceramide was most effective at 6 microM, and C6-ceramide at 60 microM. C2- or C6-ceramide at these concentrations was not toxic for monocytes, as assessed by trypan blue exclusion and by the 3-[4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-y1]-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay which measures the ability of live cells to produce formazan. C2-ceramide (20 microM) had no effect on the killing of leukaemic cells (HL-60 and K562 cells) by monocytes treated with IFN-gamma, LPS, or both for 18 hr, with killing assessed by an 111 Indium-releasing assay. C2-ceramide (20 microM) induced secretion of low amounts of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) from the monocytes. But C2-ceramide did not alter the higher secretion of TNF-alpha or IL-1 beta from monocytes treated with IFN-gamma or LPS. Thus the cell-permeable ceramides acted like antagonists of LPS, rather than analogues of LPS, as has been proposed. The results here showed that the signal transduction pathway for O2- release by monocytes differed from that for the cytolysis of leukaemic cells, and confirmed that oxygen radicals are not involved in cytolysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakabo et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: