Herein the sorption of Eu(III) and (243)Am(III) on multiwalled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are studied, and the results show that Eu(III) and (243)Am(III) could form strong inner-sphere surface complexes on CNT surfaces. However, the sorption of Eu(III) on CNTs is stronger than that of (243)Am(III) on CNTs, suggesting the difference in the interaction mechanisms or properties of Eu(III) and (243)Am(III) with CNTs, which is quite different from the results of Eu(III) and (243)Am(III) interaction on natural clay minerals and oxides. On the basis of the results of density functional theory calculations, the binding energies of Eu(III) on CNTs are much higher than those of (243)Am(III) on CNTs, indicating that Eu(III) could form stronger complexes with the oxygen-containing functional groups of CNTs than (243)Am(III), which is in good agreement with the experimental results of higher sorption capacity of CNTs for Eu(III). The oxygen-containing functional groups contribute significantly to the uptake of Eu(III) and (243)Am(III), and the binding affinity increases in the order of ≡S-OH < ≡S-COOH < ≡S-COO(-). This paper highlights the interaction mechanism of Eu(III) and (243)Am(III) with different oxygen-containing functional groups of CNTs, which plays an important role for the potential application of CNTs in the preconcentration, removal, and separation of trivalent lanthanides and actinides in environmental pollution cleanup.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: