Why the study?
Does tissue harmonic imaging improve quantitative left ventricular measurements or introduce systematic bias compared to fundamental imaging?
Does tissue harmonic imaging improve quantitative left ventricular measurements or introduce systematic bias compared to fundamental imaging?
This review explores whether the qualitative improvements of tissue harmonic imaging translate into accurate quantitative left ventricular measurements or introduce systematic bias compared to fundamental imaging.
Uncertainty persists regarding harmonic imaging's quantitative accuracy for LV measurements; leaves open potential systematic bias versus fundamental imaging.
Tissue harmonic imaging (THI) is a B mode imaging technique that improves echocardiographic image quality by reducing superficial artefact. The modality increases image signal-to-noise ratio at the expense of reduced axial resolution. While the qualitative improvements of harmonic echocardiographic imaging are widely accepted, the degree to which this is translated into improved quantitative measurements and whether THI-derived measurements result in systematic bias continue to be areas of uncertainty. This review examines differences between THI and fundamental imaging-derived measurements from a theoretical, tissue phantom and clinical perspective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Turner et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: