This study describes some results from several simulations of cumulus ensembles at the Southern Great Plains site of the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) program during the July 1995 Intensive Observation Period (IOP). A 2D cloud ensemble model (CEM) is used to simulate the macroscopic properties of midlatitude cumulus ensembles. The observed large-scale, horizontal advective tendencies and large-scale vertical velocity or the total advective tendencies are used to drive the CEM, in addition to nudging of the simulated, domain-averaged horizontal wind components toward the observed winds. A detailed comparison with available observations and tropical convection is made in this study. In general, the CEM-simulated results agree reasonably well with the available observations from the July 1995 IOP. The differences between simulations and observations are, however, much larger than those obtained in tropical cases, especially those based on the Global Atmospheric Research Program Atlantic Tropical Experiment Phase III data. Significant differences exist between the statistical properties of tropical and midlatitude cumulus convection, especially in the vertical structures of the cumulus mass fluxes, apparent heat source (Q1), and apparent moisture sink (Q2). The strong variations of the subcloud-layer thermodynamic structure and the surface fluxes in midlatitude continents have large impacts on the heat and moisture budgets. The radiative budgets and satellite-observed cloud amounts are also compared with observations. Although the agreements are reasonably good, some deficiencies of the simulations and inadequate accuracy of large-scale advective tendencies can be clearly seen from the comparisons. Sensitivity tests are performed to address these issues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: