Why the study?
Does an aerobic exercise program and meditation improve cardiovascular disease risk factors in women?
Does an aerobic exercise program and meditation improve cardiovascular disease risk factors in women?
A 10-month aerobic exercise and meditation program significantly improves cardiovascular risk factors such as blood pressure, lipids, and body composition in women.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports combined aerobic exercise and meditation for CV risk factor improvement in women; extends prior RCT evidence on multimodal lifestyle interventions.
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to search for the association of Type D personality and CVD risk factors through comparison of the association of exercise participation with CVD risk factors in women. [Subjects] The research subjects were randomly assigned to four groups: Type D+Exercise (n=12), Type D+non-exercise (n=12), non-Type D+Exercise (n=12), and non-Type D+non-exercise (n=10). The study consisted of 46 participants. [Methods] An aerobic exercise program and meditation were conducted in parallel for 10 months. Stretching was performed for 10 min as a warm-up, and then walking and running on a treadmill at 60 to 70% of HRmax were performed for 40 min three times a week. Blood samples were processed according to standard laboratory procedures. The concentrations of TG and HDL cholesterol were determined enzymatically using a clinical chemistry analyzer (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). [Results] The weight, percentage of body fat, waist circumference, triglyceride concentration, HDL cholesterol concentration, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure showed a significant difference between measurement times in the exercise groups. [Conclusion] In conclusion, there were significant differences between groups in terms of cardiovascular disease risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hur et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: