The current status and capabilities of the atomistic simulation code GULP are described. In particular, the differences between versions 1.3.2 and 3.0 are detailed, as well as a concise pointer to applications in computational crystallography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Julian D. Gale (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: