Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The localized bond model of Malrieu, Diner, and Claverie is extended to fourth order in perturbation theory. Single, double, triple, and quadruple replacements from the doubly occupied bonding reference function are included utilizing a symmetric form of diagrammatic perturbation theory. The fourth order theory derived executes on a computer as quickly as does the third order theory. Results are examined utilizing the Pariser–Parr–Pople and CNDO/2 model Hamiltonians, and are compared with third order results and with either exact results where they are known, or with a configuration interaction of all singles and doubles. The influence of the initial hybridization, localization, and bond polarization is discussed. In general, the fourth order corrections are of comparable size to third order. Improvement in results appears to be marginal in the Nesbet–Epstein scheme in passing to fourth order because of the oscillating nature of the series; for Moller–Plesset theory errors are approximately halved. The relative energies as a function of modest geometry change about minima is about the same at third order as it is at fourth for most cases examined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cullen et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: